« December 2007 | Main

February 17, 2009

Happy Birthday Charlie Darwin!

Happy Birthday Charlie Darwin! Since everyone in the sciences is marking Darwin's 200th birthday this year I thought I might throw out a few thoughts. As one would expect this anniversary has brought out many comments on the ongoing debate about evolution in the United States. One has to say the United States because we have to turn to Islamic countries like Turkey or Pakistan to find opposition to the Theory of Evolution as vociferous as we have here in the land of the free. By contrast Europeans accept Evolution without much reserve and are dismayed by our seeming ignorance. Scholars say the reason for this is because Europe is more secular and American fundamentalists write off Europeans as a bunch of godless atheists. Such monolithic views are neither accurate nor helpful. While it's true that Europeans have moved away from traditional forms of religiosity, at the same time, according to the European Values Study, they have also increasingly embraced alternative forms of religion and spirituality. This should come as no surprise. Only the most cynical of atheists deny the importance of faith and sacredness in the daily lives of human beings. We all need a sense of meaning and a relationship to something greater than ourselves to guide us through life's travails. However, to be effective, a spiritual belief system has to be congruent with reality. Europeans have accepted the validity of the reality science reveals and found the inflexible traditions and dogma's of their faith unsatisfying. They have simply moved on. This is not a move toward atheism as much as a religious evolution. Yes religions evolve. Anyone with a basic knowledge of the history of Christianity knows that interpretations of the meaning of Jesus have changed over time, in fact since the begining. This also holds true for studies in comparative religions. The real problem in America is a lack of religious maturity. Here in the states we hold on to old ideas like stubborn teenagers who'd rather live in our parents basement rather than face the uncertainties of adult life, even though the possible rewards might be substantial. I think it's a fear of what might be lost, sense of self and community, when in fact we might find better selves and stronger communities if we're willing to change. I was raised Presbyterian but I know very few members of the faith who still accept Calvin's theology as a valid interpretation of the meaning of Christian belief. As Joseph Cambell used to point out, you don't have to leave your tradition to find spiritual truths that are relevant to the time in which you live. The trick is to be flexible and find the spiritual truths within your faith that resonate with what is known about the world and leave the rest behind. Your beliefs can evolve within your tradition as religious beliefs always have. Those that provide guidance that is meaningful in the modern world will survive, others will not. To paraphrase the old saying, you might not believe in Evolution, but Evolution still believes in you and only the fittest will survive.

February 11, 2009

Does the Universe have a purpose?

"One of the things that I think science show us is that the idea that there’s some purpose to the universe is one that we should outgrow.  There’s a purpose to each one of our lives, and we can articulate what that purpose is and why we have it; but why humans emerged on earth, why there is a planet earth, why the universe does what it does, we’ve got to outgrow these questions.  It is very clear that there is no purpose in that sense.  The fact that the sun will expand and consume the entire earth; that the universe might blow apart; that 99 percent of species go extinct and it would be sort of arrogant to say that homosapiens would be the only one that doesn’t; the fact that the earth is one out of presumably thousands, and millions, and billions of planets that could support life – that there’s nothing distinguished about our solar system.  All of those realizations say that the idea that we were put here for some purpose is a kind of medieval ignorance and arrogance. ..."
Dr. Steven Pinker

Full transcript here..
http://bigthink.com/ideas/who-are-we-18

Those of you who follow these types of discussions will recognize the strong atheistic arguments of Steven Pinker. Although I find him quite brilliant, and his ideas on human evolution quite compelling, I think some times on theological points his views are a bit myopic. His argument, I think amounts to, that in a universe of vast complexity and potential for life, the human species does not have a unique or special role in some grand design and therefore there is no grand design or purpose to the universe. As far as a unique purpose for humanity, his argument is compelling, and given the type of religiosity he generally opposes, the net result is the same. Undoubtedly most conservative members of the various faiths of Abraham will be duly offended. However to say the universe has no purpose is not the same as saying that humanity is not the final result of a purpose. Pinker concedes that conscious beings such as ourselves can have a purpose as individuals and as a group but he is not willing to extend that same attribute to the universe itself. His argument is based on the assumption that the universe is not self aware. This assumption is hard to support given that we are only beginning to understand consciousness in biological systems, largely due to work like Dr. Pinkers, and we have by no means ruled out consciousness in non-biological systems. In fact our best theories of consciousness point to it being a natural byproduct of highly complex interactive systems. There is of course no more complex interactive system than the universe itself. We judge other beings self awareness by deducing from their behavior a purpose that lies behind their actions. The faithful have long looked at nature and seen patterns that implied a purpose and therefore tried to deduce the mind of the divine. Science has long tried to use natural explanations, such as the Anthropic Principle, to remove mind from the equation. In the end, if the Universe(or God if you prefer) has a purpose, it may not be inclined to inform me or Steven Pinker what it is. Only it can know for sure.

Hosting by Yahoo!